Home arrow FCA Changes
MAIN MENU

Home
Medicare and Medicaid Fraud
Pharmaceutical Fraud
Defense Contractor Fraud
Federal Government Contractor Fraud
Fraudulent Loans and Grants
Wage and Hour Laws



FCA Changes
Allergan Pays $600 Million to Resolve Allegations of Off-Label Promotion of Botox Print E-mail

Washington, D.C., Sept. 1, 2010 – American pharmaceutical manufacturer Allergan Inc. has agreed to plead guilty and pay $600 million to resolve its criminal and civil liability arising from the company’s unlawful promotion of its biological product, Botox® Therapeutic, for uses not approved as safe and effective by the Food and Drug Administration (FDA), the Justice Department announced today.  The resolution includes a criminal fine and forfeiture totaling $375 million and a civil settlement with the federal government and the states of $225 million.

Under the Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act (FDCA), a company in its application to the FDA must specify each intended use of a biological product.  After the FDA approves the product as safe and effective for a specified use, any promotion by the manufacturer for other uses – known as “off-label” uses – renders the product misbranded.

Tony West, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice, and Sally Quillian Yates, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia, today announced the filing of a criminal information against Allergan for promoting Botox® for headache, pain, spasticity and juvenile cerebral palsy – none of which were approved by the FDA.  According to the criminal information, Allergan made it a top corporate priority to maximize sales of Botox® for such off-label uses.

In 1989, the FDA approved Botox®, a prescription biological product containing botulinum toxin type A, a purified neurotoxin, to treat strabismus (crossed eyes) and blepharospasm (involuntary eyelid muscle contraction).  In 2000 and 2004, approval was given to treat cervical dystonia (involuntary neck muscle contraction) and primary axillary hyperhidrosis (excessive underarm sweating), respectively.  In 2010, approval was given to treat adult upper-limb spasticity.

The criminal information alleges that Allergan exploited its on-label cervical dystonia (CD) indication to grow off-label pain and headache (HA) sales.  In 2003, Allergan developed the “CD/HA Initiative” as a “rescue strategy” in the event of negative results from its clinical trials to ensure continued expansion into the pain and headache markets.  As part of this initiative, Allergan claimed that cervical dystonia was “underdiagnosed” and that doctors could diagnose cervical dystonia based on headache and pain symptoms, even when the doctor “doesn’t see any cervical dystonia.”

Allergan’s off-label marketing tactics also included calling on doctors who typically treat patients with off-label conditions.  In 2003, Allergan doubled the size of its reimbursement team to assist doctors in obtaining payment for off-label Botox® injections.  Allergan held workshops to teach doctors and their office staffs how to bill for off-label uses, conducted detailed audits of doctors’ billing records to demonstrate how they could make money by injecting Botox®, and operated the Botox® Reimbursement Hotline, which provided a wide array of free on-demand services to doctors for off-label uses.  Allergan also lobbied government health care programs to expand coverage for off-label uses, directed physician workshops and dinners focused on off-label uses, paid doctors to attend “advisory boards” promoting off-label uses, and created a purportedly independent online neurotoxin education organization to stimulate increased use of Botox® for off-label indications.

“The Food, Drug and Cosmetic Act protects the public from drugs and biologic products that are not proven to be safe and effective.  When drug companies make unsubstantiated and misleading statements about their products, they undermine the Act’s protection of public health,” said Tony West, Assistant Attorney General for the Civil Division of the Department of Justice.  “We will continue to pursue drug companies that violate the Act for their own financial gain.”

“The FDA had approved therapeutic uses of Botox for only four rare conditions, yet Allergan made it a top corporate priority to maximize sales of far more lucrative off-label uses that were not approved by FDA,” said Sally Yates, U.S. Attorney for the Northern District of Georgia.  “Allergan further demanded tremendous growth in these off-label sales year after year, even when there was little clinical evidence that these uses were effective.  The FDA approval process ensures that pharmaceutical companies market their medications for uses that are proven to be safe and effective, and this case demonstrates that companies that fail to comply with these rules face criminal prosecution and stiff penalties.”

Allergan has agreed to plead guilty to a criminal misdemeanor for misbranding Botox® in violation of the FDCA.  Under the plea agreement, the company will pay a criminal fine of $375 million, which includes forfeiting assets of $25 million.  Allergan’s guilty plea and sentence is not final until accepted by the U.S. District Court.

“The FDA exists to assure that drugs marketed to the American people are safe and effective” said Dr. Margaret Hamburg, Commissioner, Food and Drug Administration. “The ‘off-label’ promotion of drugs threatens public health and the role of the FDA, which has served our country well and has protected Americans from unsafe and ineffective drugs.”

As part of the civil settlement, Allergan has agreed to pay an additional $225 million to the federal government and the states to resolve claims that its unlawful marketing practices caused false claims to be submitted to government health care programs such as Medicare, Medicaid, TRICARE, and to the Federal Employees Health Benefit Program, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs, and the Department of Labor’s Office of Workers’ Compensation Programs.   The civil settlement addresses allegations that from 2001 through at least 2008, Allergan promoted Botox for off-label indications that were not medically accepted and therefore not covered by federal health care programs, made unsubstantiated and misleading statements about the safety and efficacy of Botox® for off-label indications, instructed doctors to miscode Botox® claims for uncovered indications using inappropriate diagnosis codes to ensure payment by government health care programs, and provided inducements to doctors to inject more Botox®.   The federal share of the civil settlement amount is $210,250,000, and Allergan will pay up to $14,750,000 to states that opt to participate in the agreement.

The civil settlement resolves three lawsuits filed in federal court in the Northern District of Georgia under the qui tam, or whistleblower, provisions of the False Claims Act, which allow private citizens to bring civil actions on behalf of the United States and share in any recovery.  As part of today’s resolution, the whistleblowers – Dr. Amy Lang, Charles Rushin, Cher Beilfuss, Kathleen O'Conner-Masse, and Edward Hallivis – will receive $37.8 million from the federal share of the settlement amount.    

Allergan has also executed a Corporate Integrity Agreement (CIA) with the Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General (HHS-OIG).  The 5-year CIA requires, among other things, that the board of directors (or a committee of the board) annually review the company’s compliance program and pass a resolution that it has implemented an effective compliance program; that certain senior executives annually certify that their departments or functional areas are compliant with federal health care program requirements; that Allergan send doctors a letter notifying them about the settlement; and that the company post on its website information about payments to doctors, such as honoraria, travel, or lodging.  Allergan is subject to exclusion from federal health care programs, including Medicare and Medicaid, for a material breach of the CIA and subject to monetary penalties for less significant breaches.

“Fraudulent marketing of drugs through off-label promotion or kickbacks to prescribers undermines the protections afforded by the drug approval process and medical decision-making.  This conduct will not be tolerated,” said Daniel R. Levinson, Inspector General of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services.  “As a result of this settlement, OIG will oversee a Corporate Integrity Agreement with Allergan that increases the transparency of Allergan’s interactions with physicians and helps to ensure the company’s future compliance and accountability.”

“This was a complex investigation that required much in terms of investigative resources in order to conduct the many interviews and document reviews needed to get us where we are today,” said Brian D. Lamkin, Special Agent in Charge, FBI Atlanta.  “The FBI, through its vast experience investigating health care fraud, is not only able to provide such resources, but is also able to recognize which circumstances need those resources the most.  The off-label marketing tactics employed by Allergen was one of those aforementioned circumstances.”

Allergan markets Botox® for its approved cosmetic use under the trade name Botox® Cosmetic.  Botox® Cosmetic has its own FDA-approved label and drug code.  The resolution announced today does not address Botox® Cosmetic.

The criminal case is being prosecuted by the Civil Division’s Office of Consumer Litigation and the U.S. Attorney’s Office for the Northern District of Georgia.  The civil settlement was reached by the Civil Division’s Commercial Litigation Branch and the U.S. Attorney’s Office.  The HHS Office of Counsel to the Inspector General, the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services, FDA’s Office of Chief Counsel, and the National Association of Medicaid Fraud Control Units provided assistance.

This matter was investigated by the FBI, the FDA’s Office of Criminal Investigation, and the HHS-OIG.  The Office of Personnel Management Office of Inspector General, TRICARE Program Integrity, the Department of Veterans’ Affairs Office of Inspector General, and the Department of Labor Office of Inspector General provided investigative assistance. 

“Federal employees and indeed the American taxpayers deserve health care providers and suppliers, including drug manufacturers, that meet the highest standards of ethical and professional behavior,” said Patrick E. McFarland, Inspector General of the U.S. Office of Personnel Management.  “Today’s settlement once again reminds the pharmaceutical industry that it must observe those standards and reflects the commitment of federal law enforcement organizations to pursue improper and illegal conduct that places health care consumers at risk.”

This settlement is part of the government’s emphasis on combating health care fraud.  One of the most powerful tools in that effort is the False Claims Act, which the Justice Department has used to recover approximately $3.1 billion since January 2009 in cases involving fraud against federal health care programs.  The Justice Department’s total recoveries in False Claims Act cases since January 2009 have topped $4 billion.

 
The Tragedy of the Clemens Print E-mail

By Reuben Guttman

Federal prosecutors have indicted former baseball star pitcher, Roger Clemens, for lying to Congress about his alleged use of steroids.

Whether Roger Clemens took steroids and whether, if he took steroids, his statistics need to be placed in a different light undoubtedly is proper banter for the sports pages.

This country has a drug problem but the focus of that problem is not the baseball diamond. There are - as I have said in this blog - more children watching baseball who are on performance enhancing drugs than there are players who play professional baseball. Pharmaceutical companies place drugs on the market that are not safe or effective, and then the companies proceed to misrepresent to the medical community and the public the truth about their products. Meanwhile, our health care systems bear the costs of paying for these products and the damage they cause.

Maybe it is a lot easier and more interesting - at least for the TV news as it currently exists in a withered state - to focus on Roger Clemens. Unfortunately, the “tragedy of the Clemens” is that there is indeed a real drug problem in this country and Roger Clemens has nothing to do with it. Congress and prosecutors need to focus their attention elsewhere. At the end of the day, a multi-million dollar trial of Mr. Clemens will do nothing more than embarrass a former baseball star who at worst made the mistake of not being candid about a subject that - probably from his perspective - should not be one of material public importance.

Be first to comment this article | Add as favorites (4) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 36

 
Corporate Integrity Agreements: Asking the Companies to Police Themselves, Please Print E-mail

The use of a corporate integrity agreements (“CIA”) in resolving the prosecution of pharmaceutical and medical companies is commonplace.  As part of a deferred prosecution agreement, the U.S. Department of Justice, or the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Office of Inspector General, will ask the defendant corporation to enter into a CIA to police its behavior and, in part, ensure compliance with the terms of the settlement.

Read the entire article . . .

Read more...
 
Justice Denied Print E-mail

By Reuben Guttman

There are approximately 875 federal judicial slots, and approximately 90 openings, give or take. The President is not appointing judges quickly enough, and when he does submit nominations, the Senate is delaying their confirmation. Up on Capitol Hill, the Democrats are blaming the Republicans for holding up judicial nominations, while the Republicans counter that the Democrats are naming candidates unworthy of appointment.

Caught in the middle are those working men and women who need a fully staffed federal court system. Who is it that uses the federal judicial system? It is working people, shareholders, and consumers. Laws protecting the environment, employee savings, the rights of shareholders, and the rights of workers on the job are federal laws that for the most part get enforced in federal court. Those who seek to invoke these laws for their protection are not large corporate interests but working people. Cut back on the number of judges and justice is delayed. And, as the British Statesman William Ewart Gladstone was reported to have said: "Justice delayed is justice denied."

Be first to comment this article | Add as favorites (9) | Quote this article on your site | Views: 65

 
U.S. Files Complaint Against Oracle Alleging Contract Fraud Print E-mail

Washington, D.C., July 29, 2010 – The United States has intervened and filed a complaint under the False Claims Act against Oracle Corporation and Oracle America Inc. The government alleges that Oracle defrauded the United States on a General Services Administration (GSA) software contract that was in effect from 1998 to 2006 and involved hundreds of millions of dollars in sales.

Read more...
 
<< Start < Prev 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 Next > End >>

Results 1 - 9 of 141
 
 

Copyright © 2001 - 2009, CDImage, LLC and its licensors.