Click Here to Search the Answer Center

The Law: An Overview

False Claims Act Whistleblower Employee Protections

In 1986, Congress added anti-retaliation protections to the False Claims Act. These provisions, which did not exist previously, are contained in 31 U.S.C. Sec. 3730(h):

Any employee who is discharged, demoted, suspended, threatened, harassed, or in any other manner discriminated against in the terms and conditions of employment by his or her employer because of lawful acts done by the employee on behalf of his employer or others in furtherance of an action under this section, including investigation for, initiation of, testimony for, or assistance in an action filed or to be filed under this section, shall be entitled to all relief necessary to make the employee whole.

The protection against retaliation extends to whistleblowers whose allegations could legitimately support a False Claims Act case even if the case is never filed. The statute of limitations for Sec. 3730(h) claims is 6 years in most jurisdictions, but is currently shorter in California and a few other locations.

The whistleblower plaintiff is entitled to reinstatement with seniority, double back pay, interest, special damages sustained as a result of discriminatory treatment, and attorneys fees and costs. There is federal jurisdiction for these whistleblower claims. To establish a Sec. 3730(h) retaliatory discharge claim, the whistleblower must engage in conduct protected by the False Claims Act. Second, the courts require a showing that the defendant have some notice of the protected conduct that the whistleblower was either taking action in furtherance of a qui tam action or assisting in an investigation or actions brought by the Government. Finally, the whistleblower must show that the termination was in retaliation for the protected activities. A False Claims Act qui tam case can include whistleblower claims and other legal claims based upon other state and federal laws.

 


Federal and State Whistleblower Laws: An Overview

There are dozens of federal laws protecting whistleblowers or otherwise designed to protect workers from retaliation or other illegal treatment.  There are also many similar state and local laws. Most lawyers are not familiar with the employment laws pertaining to whistleblowing and few will know the laws outside the states in which they practice. Before making decisions based upon state laws, you should do some research yourself and consult with an experienced employment/labor attorney, accustomed to representing plaintiffs, to inform yourself about the various federal and state laws which might apply to protect you in your particular circumstances.

Federal Whistleblower Protection Laws

Unlike the False Claims Act, which allows a whistleblower to file a lawsuit in federal court, many of the federal whistleblower laws do not permit a whistleblower to go directly to court, but instead are to be pursued "administratively."  Congress designed many of these laws so that an individual, with or without an attorney, may make a simple complaint or "charge" of retaliatory discrimination to a federal government agency. If not resolved administratively, an administrative law judge may preside over the only evidentiary hearing that will take place.  Some retaliation and whistleblower statutes are relatively "hollow," that is, they prohibit illegal employer retaliation, but do not allow the individual to pursue an administrative charge or file a lawsuit.  In legalese, such laws are described as providing no "private cause of action." 

Whistleblowers are cautioned, however, not to delay investigation of their possible legal remedies, as many of the laws have very short time limits. Some federal whistleblower statutes of limitations are as short as 30 days from the date of the alleged retaliation. A retaliation claim must be brought to the attention of the appropriate federal government official within that time period or cannot be pursued.

Many federal whistleblower laws are administered by the U.S. Department of Labor (DOL). When a complaint is to be filed under these whistleblower laws, they should be filed in writing with the local OSHA (Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the Department of Labor) Office and/or mailed to:

Office of the Assistant Secretary, Occupational Safety & Health Administration
U.S. Department of Labor
200 Constitution Ave., N.W .
Washington, DC 20210

However, the 50-plus federal whistleblower and retaliation laws vary dramatically and the Department of Labor/OSHA is not the intake office for all such claims. Some retaliation statutes provide that the EEOC is the proper intake agency. If neither OSHA nor the EEOC is the proper intake office, however, filing a claim with those agencies will likely not be sufficient to protect legal rights.  Various federal statutes specify still other procedures, including some that have no mandatory administrative or other prerequisites and allow whistleblower or retaliation lawsuits to be filed directly in state or federal court.

Whistleblower or similar anti-retaliation protections providing a private cause of action or administrative remedy are also found in various federal statutes.  Click here to view a list of those statutes.  Our list is still "under construction," but should assist you in researching your own situation. 

In addition, The United States Constitution, pursuant to the First and Fourteenth Amendments, protects state and local government whistleblower employees from retaliation.

While they do not afford any specific whistleblower protections, these other statutes may  assist in the prosecution of those who retaliate against whistleblowers:

18 U.S.C. Sec. 1031 Major Fraud Act of 1989
18 U.S.C. Sec. 1505 Penalties for obstruction of government investigations
45 U.S.C. Sec.    60 Penalties for obstruction of government agency proceedings

Additional references on these topics include:

Job Rights & Survival Strategies: A Handbook for Terminated Employees (National Employee Rights Institute 1997), to order call 1-800-469-NERI. ($19.95, $10 each if bought in groups of 10)

Government Accountability Project, National Office, 1612 K Street, Suite 400, Washington, D.C. 20006, The Whistleblower's Survival Guide (1997) and "Federal Whistleblower Laws and Related Statutes."

The National Whistleblower Center also has a new publication, published in 2001, primarily designed for lawyers handling claims under various federal whistleblower statutes.  It is entitled Concepts and Procedures in Whistleblower Law. 

(Web links to some of the federal agencies, legal research sources for the federal whistleblower laws and statutes, and several of the whistleblower groups mentioned above are listed in the Whistleblowerlaws Links section.) 

State Whistleblower Protection Laws

Most states have some sort of statutory or common law "whistleblower" or anti-retaliation laws.  Like the federal whistleblower laws, not every lawyer will know about these laws, especially laws outside their own state.

These states and the District of Columbia have recognized a public policy exception to the "employment at will doctrine": Alaska, Arizona, Arkansas, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Hawaii, Idaho, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Michigan, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nebraska, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New Mexico, North Carolina, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, Tennessee, Texas, Vermont, Virginia, Washington, West Virginia, Wisconsin and Wyoming.

Some states have explicit statutory protections for whistleblowers. These include: California, Connecticut, Delaware, Florida, Hawaii, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, Montana, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oregon, Rhode Island, Tennessee, and Washington.

There are also state laws that offer special protections just for their own state or local government employees: Alaska, Arizona, California, Colorado, Connecticut, Florida, Georgia, Hawaii, Illinois, Indiana, Iowa, Kansas, Kentucky, Louisiana, Maine, Maryland, Massachusetts, Minnesota, Missouri, Montana, Nevada, New Hampshire, New Jersey, New York, North Carolina, Ohio, Oklahoma, Oregon, Pennsylvania, Rhode Island, South Carolina, South Dakota, Tennessee, Texas, Utah, Washington, West Virginia, and Wisconsin.


  For Up To The Minute Information On   Pending Securities Fraud Litigation,
Check Out www.thecorporateinsider.com

 

Site contents used under license